[ad1]
Table of Contents
This document is an adapted version of our Europe Express newsletter. Superior subscribers can enroll here to receive the newsletter sent daily and on Saturday mornings. Standard subscribers can upgrade to Premium here or explore all FT newsletters.
Hello and welcome! The far-right party, Alternative for Germany, has secured a victory in the eastern region of Thuringia, marking the first time such a party has triumphed in a state poll in Germany after World War II. This unprecedented political event carries significant implications for both Berlin and Brussels.
In this article, we will delve into the initial moves being made as part of the upcoming contentious battle to shape the European Union’s next budget. Our Netherlands correspondent will also provide insight into the Dutch government’s decision not to send mpox vaccines to Africa.
Shaping the EU Budget
While discussions around roles within Ursula von der Leyen’s second commission are currently at the forefront of conversation in Brussels circles, there is a more fundamental contest underway: money—€1.2tn to be precise.
Here’s some context: The EU agrees on its shared budget every seven years, with 2027 marking an expiration date for its current plan. Securing unanimous support from member states that fund it is essential, and negotiations over its allocation typically span several years.
The budget set for 2028-2034 stands out as one of unparalleled consequence and will inevitably provoke intense debate. Preparations have already commenced behind closed doors at the European Commission before springing into action across various capitals shortly thereafter.
Von der Leyen’s proposed strategy involves transforming assistance for less developed regions—commonly known as cohesion funds—by introducing conditions tied to economic reforms rather than merely providing financial aid to impoverished areas without strings attached.
Advocates view this approach through two primary lenses: theoretically more efficient utilization of funds leading towards economic growth and potential cost savings given that not all beneficiaries would meet these new conditions.
Opponents raise compelling concerns on this matter: potential political exploitation could result from withholding funds if conditions are unmet by a central government operating against an opposition-held region – while others argue that poorer member states agreed upon entering the EU with an understanding that their economies would open up in exchange for these funds; therefore any alteration could disrupt this agreement.
Subsequently, while every capital may wish for additional areas where EU funding can be allocated effectively few are willing to see overall spending levels increase—a dynamic prompting efficiency measures as an early buzzword under von der Leyen 2.0.
– What are the battle lines that have emerged among member states in the budget negotiations?
The European Union’s next €1.2tn budget is shaping up to be a monumental battle that will have far-reaching implications for the future of the EU. The negotiations and debates around this budget are set to be epic, featuring competing interests from member states, various sectors, and political groups. As the EU grapples with the challenges of post-Brexit and post-COVID-19 recovery, the budget will play a critical role in shaping the continent’s future.
The EU’s long-term budget, also known as the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), sets the framework for the EU’s annual budget and covers a seven-year period. This budget is significant as it not only determines the EU’s spending priorities but also reflects the Union’s vision for its future. The next MFF, covering the period from 2021 to 2027, is set to be the EU’s biggest ever, amounting to €1.2tn. The negotiation process for this budget is a complex and contentious affair, with multiple stakeholders vying for resources and influence.
Keywords: EU budget, European Union, MFF, Multiannual Financial Framework, €1.2tn, post-Brexit, post-COVID-19, recovery, negotiation, member states
The Stakes and Priorities
The EU’s next budget comes at a critical juncture for the Union. In the wake of Brexit, the EU is recalibrating its priorities and funding mechanisms, seeking to fill the void left by the departure of one of its key contributors. Simultaneously, the COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc on the European economy, necessitating substantial investment in recovery and resilience. The EU’s budget negotiations are thus set against a backdrop of heightened urgency and competing demands.
At the heart of the budget battle are the competing priorities of member states. Countries in Central and Eastern Europe are keen to maintain cohesion funds, which have been instrumental in their development. Southern European nations, on the other hand, are advocating for increased funding for agriculture, infrastructure, and job creation. Meanwhile, net contributor countries such as Germany, the Netherlands, and others are looking to recalibrate the budget to reflect new realities, including increased spending on security, defense, and innovation.
Keywords: Brexit, COVID-19, European economy, recovery, resilience, cohesion funds, Southern Europe, agriculture, infrastructure, job creation, net contributor, security, defense, innovation
The Battle Lines
The budget negotiations have already seen the emergence of clear battle lines, with member states forming coalitions and alliances to advocate for their interests. The so-called “Frugal Four” comprising Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Sweden have been vocal in their insistence on a smaller budget and stricter conditions for allocation. These countries are wary of seeing their contributions rise, especially in the absence of the UK.
Conversely, the Visegrad Group – comprising the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia – are pushing for the maintenance of cohesion funds, which have been essential in their economic and social development. Meanwhile, southern European countries have banded together in advocating for increased funding for agricultural subsidies and regional development.
Keywords: Frugal Four, Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden, Visegrad Group, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, cohesion funds, agricultural subsidies, regional development
The Role of the European Parliament
While the budget negotiations primarily take place among member states in the European Council, the European Parliament also plays a crucial role in shaping the final budget. The Parliament has the power to approve, amend, or reject the budget through its co-decision procedure with the Council. As such, it has considerable leverage in influencing the budget’s allocation and spending priorities.
The European Parliament has been vocal in advocating for a more ambitious and robust budget, particularly in light of the EU’s post-COVID-19 recovery needs. Members of the Parliament are seeking to boost funding for health, research, infrastructure, and digitalization, aligning with the EU’s long-term objectives of promoting sustainable growth and innovation.
Keywords: European Parliament, European Council, co-decision procedure, post-COVID-19 recovery, health, research, infrastructure, digitalization, sustainable growth, innovation
Conclusion
The battle over the EU’s next €1.2tn budget is set to be an epic struggle that will shape the Union’s future for years to come. The negotiations will be fraught with competing interests and demands as member states seek to secure funding for their priorities. The outcome of these negotiations will have far-reaching implications for the EU’s post-Brexit and post-COVID-19 recovery, reflecting the Union’s vision and commitment to solidarity, development, and innovation. As the budget battle unfolds, all eyes will be on Brussels, where the fate of the €1.2tn budget will be decided.
Numerous countries are positioning themselves strategically concerning who represents them within influential roles such as budget commissioner—all vying fiercely due to their vested interests even though senior officials within commissioned departments under a President now serving her second term have already begun drafting substantial parts involved in discussing policy related matters over time.
Luxury Problems
Ireland faces quite an enviable dilemma compared with many other countries worldwide having accumulated €8.6bn surplus capital along with robust economic growth reaching fivefold greater levels than initially anticipated last year What approach should Ireland take toward managing its excess?
Impact of Dutch Policies
Geert Wilders’ campaign pledge last year focused on prioritizing Dutch citizens’ interests over others – which his government has upheld by rejecting requests made pertaining delivery shipment Africa’s current mpox vaccine stockpile However differences arise among coalition members concerning whether some doses should be donated according decision rendered health minister Fleur Agema despite looming expiration possible need future use Another recommendation suggested directly addresses mitigating outbreaks thus potentially preventing disease migration sort argument emerges within governing leadership
Customary Donations By Other Nations:
European health commissioner Stella Kyriakides recently called upon all European Union member states urgently allocate portions their existing supplies mpox vaccine African countries encountering heightened rates whereas approximately twelve nations including Kenyan Ugandan governments reported incidents bulk burden remaining contributed well mix providing nation example stepped forward mainly standard clear blueprint necessitates collaborative response concerned aspects scarcity making suitable arrangements effort’
Meanwhile—Health Emergency Preparedness Response Authority linked issue brought forth massive contribution totaling equivalent few hundred thousand also been delivered respectively numbers steadily trending upward multiple fronts noticeable gap exists correlating between revealed actual actions remain undisclosed publicly expected updating next week Knowledgeable sources disclosed specificity associated timeline relating forthcoming reports due during specified timeframe
[ad2]
